The siblings of the Dare family behind the Canadian cookie-and-candy empire once had a “normal” relationship, but those bonds had already started to show cracks by the time each received shares in the multi-million dollar company, a Toronto court heard.

“There’s no doubt that the threat of litigation has been used since the day Carolyn got her shares,” Bryan Dare said during his testimony in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on Wednesday.

His testimony came on the third day of a trial which will decide the fate of the Kitchener, Ont.-based company, which sells popular confectionery and biscuit products such as Bear Paws and Breton Crackers in more than 50 countries.

Carolyn Dare-Wilfred says she has been shunned by the family on both a personal and business level, shut out from accessing the value of her stake and unable to sell it.

Dare-Wilfred is seeking legal relief under a provision of the Ontario Business Corporation Act called the oppression remedy. If she convinces the court her brothers — fellow shareholders in a holding company which owns 80 per cent of Dare Foods — have been acting in an “oppressive or unfairly prejudicial manner” she can ask for actions including an order that would force them to buy her shares at fair market price or put them up for auction.

In their testimony, both Bryan and Graham Dare painted a picture of the family that played baseball in the backyard and which had spent Christmases together.

Graham told the court that he and Dare-Wilfred had a “normal brother and sister” relationship, but grew apart as they got older.

Handout
HandoutCarolyn Dare-Wilfred with her husband Harmon Wilfred in a 2004 photo. Ms. Dare-Wilfred is the great-granddaughter of C. H. Doerr who founded what would become Dare Foods in 1892.

And after Dare-Wilfred’s husband Harmon Wilfred — a self-proclaimed whistleblower who says he was a financial contractor for the Central Intelligence Agency — was arrested in 1998 following a custody battle with his ex-wife, the couple were no longer invited to his house, said Graham.

Both brothers and their father, Carl Dare — who built the company into the multinational conlomerate — were skeptical of Wilfred, according to the brothers’ testimony.

In 2001, when Dare-Wilfred and her husband left Canada for New Zealand, she began trying to sell her shares.

One interested suitor at the time was U.S. multinational food company Kellogg, but it was only interested in a majority stake, said Bryan, something the brothers were not interested in.

In 2001, their father bought 25 per cent of Carolyn’s shares for $5-million. She was also entitled to an annual dividend of $341,000. She has received some $7-million, which Bryan said was thought to be enough for Dare-Wilfred to live a comfortable life.

We have shares in the company and having more shares wouldn’t make a difference

By 2014, Dare-Wilfred was looking to sell her stake again. Quebec’s LeClerc biscuits was seen as a potential buyer, Bryan said, but none of the discussions led to a sale.

Under the shareholder agreement, Dare-Wilfred has to offer to sell her share of Serad Holdings to her brothers first before seeking other suitors.

Bryan said, under cross-examination, that there is a disincentive for potential outside buyers as they would have to sign on to the same shareholder agreement that binds the siblings, but that the shares are saleable.

The brothers, however, are not interested in buying Dare-Wilfred’s stake, which she priced at $55-million, Graham said.

“We have shares in the company and having more shares wouldn’t make a difference,” Graham said. “Having to go borrow money to buy those shares would make a difference…. I don’t have $55-million sitting around to put into this, which doesn’t change things.”

Financial Post

aligaya@postmedia.com

Twitter.com/arminaligaya